Take a good look at the photo of this guy, Colorado State Representative Ron Weinberg (R, Loveland). He’s gunning to be the House minority whip, the No. 3 GOP position.

 Then read what he had to say to two women at a pair of conservative leadership events while he was head of the Larimer County GOP, but before he was elected to the statehouse. You know, when it was all fun and games before the leadership dream was hatched.

Two women accuse Republican state lawmaker of making unwanted sexual advances. He denies the allegations.

His attorney is of course “pursuing all legal options!!” Maybe start the pursuit with the reason why truth is a defense to a defamation action. It’s because if a damaging or disparaging statement is true, it cannot unjustly harm someone’s reputation. It’s already in the tank. And getting bombed and making unwanted sexual advances doesn’t mitigate your situation, bub.

After an “extensive review,” the Department of Justice and the FBI found no evidence that convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein had a client list or that he blackmailed prominent “associates.”

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/07/g-s1-76367/doj-jeffrey-epstein-memo

Months ago, Attorney General Pam Bondi had discussed the client list with the press.

Bondi has long promised to release documents from the Epstein investigation. She made public a small batch of files in February, and said the move was part of the administration’s “commitment to transparency and lifting the veil on the disgusting actions of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators.”

That same month, she told Fox News in an interview that Epstein’s client list was “sitting on my desk right now to review.”

Id.

As a reader from Australia pointed out to me last week, the actions of the corrupt are always to protect the white collar pedophiles, and these freaks at the top of the predatory food chain always protect each other.

Oh yeah, and–

FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino have previously raised questions about the official account of Epstein and his death. Since taking top jobs at the bureau, though, they have publicly stated that Epstein killed himself.

Id.

So it’s all good, folks–Epstein was just a “regular” pedophile and he offed himself. Nothing to see here.

Soon enough there will probably be nothing at all to see here. No island, no plane; who was Jeffrey Epstein?

We all know the kind of men who are on a client list like this. Always in invisible ink.

So some big boys are, for now, not sweating at all. Crisis averted. They do whatever they want, to whomever they want. There are no barriers, much secrecy, and never any accountability.

There is no Epstein client list–any more.

If you get a rainy July 4th holiday or need a break from hosting guests, check out this article in Texas Monthly, “It Was Already One of Texas’s Strangest Cold Cases. Then a Secretive Figure Appeared: Jason Landry’s disappearance confounded the state’s top investigators. When thousands of online sleuths got involved, intrigue turned into obsession,” by Peter Holley.

https://www.texasmonthly.com/true-crime/jason-landry-missing-person-texas/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ten_tabs&utm_campaign=FIREFOX-EDITORIAL-TENTABS-2025_07_01&position=4&category=fascinating_stories&scheduled_corpus_item_id=43974339-d668-4a99-b7d3-201d88166dc9&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.texasmonthly.com%2Ftrue-crime%2Fjason-landry-missing-person-texas%2F

You might have to give an email address to read it, but this publication is more generous than most in allowing a free read of one or two articles.

The story is about the mystery of the disappearance of 21-year-old Jason Landry the evening of December 13, 2020, in Luling, Texas as he was driving home from college. His wrecked car was found on the side of Salt Flat Road, which was a deviation from the route home. His clothing, watch, shoes and backpack were found near the car. No sign of him has ever been found.

Holley discusses the days and hours before Jason Landry’s disappearance, the apparent missteps of the official investigation, and the subsequent investigations of citizen sleuths as well as the “true crime fanatics” on social media. At part VII he begins a discussion of the strange interactions between participants from a Facebook group dedicated to Jason’s case. I think some of you might find it very interesting.

A number of things stuck out to me, and one of them was that when the Texas State Attorney General’s Office got involved for a time with the case, they would issue announcements on the anniversary of Jason’s disappearance and reassure the public of their “unwavering commitment” to the investigation.

Does anyone remember any similar announcements by law enforcement in the OCCK case? I remember that when the task force was shut down in December 1978 and every time there was a recorded passing of the torch to a detective or two at the MSP, it was more like–if we get tips, we will investigate them.

I don’t remember any “unwavering commitment” being expressed after December 1978. I do remember a certain MSP detective saying more than once that they were not going to do anything that would stir up “useless tips.” He wouldn’t have known a “useless” tip if if sat across the table from him. In Georgia.