A reader sent another good interview with Dr. Mittelman about the work of Othram Labs to identify DNA in cold cases requiring advanced technologies.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-prosecutors/id1513765512?i=1000586222162
If the evidence in the OCCK case is not amenable to this type of testing, this should be explained to the public. If testing at the Michigan State lab or at Quantico over the years has extinguished the DNA in this case, tell the public. Quit with the arrogant secrecy when everyone knows there will never be an arrest in this case.
Why are we not entitled to an explanation of how all of the evidence in this case has been handled over the years? Why, when there are four sets of clothing, four autopsy kits, four cases’ worth of evidence, is there no support for having all of it tested by a lab like Othram? If due to storage failures over the decades, all of it is degraded and contaminated, why won’t someone explain why and more importantly, how it will never happen again?
How is the OCCK case so different from the many other cold cases of similar vintage that have been solved through the use of a lab like Othram? Authorities never made an arrest in this case. Does this immunize them from questions or a review of the case?
In the wake of the many DNA/genetic genealogy solves in cold cases around the world, authorities compound the suspicion by avoiding this fundamental question: Why are you unwilling or unable to use a lab like Othram to evaluate these cold cases?
Ignoring this obvious question compounds the many failures in this case.
Another reader sent this interesting link from GEDmatch about the genetic witness program:
Finally, another reader informed me today that Det/Sgt Dave Robertson, who ran defense for the MSP on the OCCK case for quite a few years, died on November 21, 2022 at the age of 64.